Science IS Truth

Science is all about the search for truth. For centuries lab notebooks, data, procedure and method have all been open to the entire scientific community. Once one team of researchers has a breakthrough they relay how they did it, with the data the used to get their results, to other researchers in the sincere hope that they can reproduce the same results. If they do then the world has a scientific breakthrough on its hands. If they don't then it's back to the drawing board to find out where it went wrong and come at the problem from a different angle, in the hopes of getting the results they desire.

In other words, Gentle Reader, if they cannot ever get their hypothesis proven by data, experimentation and reproducible results, they are WRONG. And, more importantly, they must accept that they are wrong and move on. It's just a theory, right? There are millions of theories. Not everyone of them is correct. Look at how long theoretical physicists have been slaving on the "Theory of Everything". They are banging their heads against a formidable brick wall. But they keep looking at the problem from different angles, adjusting their hypothesis when the data just does not support their angle of attack. Why? Because if the data and facts don't support your hypothesis you need to RETHINK your hypothesis, not keep trying to hammer square pegs in to round holes.

The one rule that has been sacrosanct throughout scientific inquiry is that the data must, Must, MUST support the hypothesis. You cannot get around this, because anything else is fiction and lies and scientists, real scientists, are not in that business. To skew data, to fudge facts is an offense equal to, if not greater than, murder, within the scientific community. Just ask Hwang Woo-suk, North Korean disgraced scientist who tried to buy human eggs and lied about lab results of stem cell research. His name is anathema within the scientific community. He is lifted up as what a scientist is not.

Let's make this crystal clear, science is not about making things up to fit a preconceived notion. Science is about finding the truth, even if the truth is that we are wrong in our suppositions. If a scientist is willing to hide data, fudge facts or refuses to show his data, they are no longer a scientist. They are Snake Oil Salesmen. They are trying to sell you snake oil to cure your common cold. They are the men behind the curtain. The Global Warming idiots have just become the Wizard of Oz.

For the past week, those of us who pay attention to these things, have been reeling from the news coming out from the brilliant whistle blower who hacked into the University of East Anglia computers and culled the email and documents proving, yes actual data that proves something, that global warming idiots have been lying through their teeth for years, knew it, and actively hid and destroyed evidence that they were wrong.

Hide the Decline. Let me get this right, we can't prove our hypothesis, but there is such a huge monetary interest in Anthropogenic Climate Change that the world cannot possibly discover that Al Gore and his moronic Frankensteins are all wrong and the Nobel Committee may have to take away an award because the guy was pushing FALSE SCIENCE. The Nobel Committee in Stockholm is now a laughingstock. It's clearly shown that they are not promoting the best and brightest within the world committee, but are, in fact, promoting charlatanism in a huge way. Thanks for making Alfred Nobel's philanthropy a joke, retards. This is what he gets for feeling guilty about inventing Tri-nitrotoluene. His committee blows up his best effort. Way to go Nobel Committee!

Now Barbara Boxer wishes to hide this under the carpet and instead concentrate efforts into finding who leaked the facts. Stupid bitch. Die in a fire. Hopefully with Nancy Pelosi in a Ford Pinto with Goodyear radials. I'll bring the marshmallows.

For years, reputable scientists have been trying to tell the world that the global warming morons were lying. They had proof, real data, real facts. They were continually shut down by the big Green Machine because how can they make money and get a Nobel Prize if the truth is known? I mean, let's be honest here, in the past twenty years if you wanted to get grant money all you had to do was tag on "... and it's effect on global warming" to your application and abstract. Damn you Welsh coal miners and damn you Margaret Thatcher for starting this whole mess.

I used to subscribe to numerous scientific journals. This next year I will cancel subscriptions to the last two I still suffered through. Scientific American and Science News, in the past two years have joyfully begun drinking the kool-aid with abandon, regardless of facts. They have aided and abetted in suborning and defiling the peer review process. They have managed to harm science more irrevocably than the global warming morons because they KNEW the data did not support the hypothesis and found ways to aid and abet the liars and charlatans and report on their crap "findings".

For that kind of scientific news I can easily read North Korean Stem Cell research papers from early 2003. And it's effect on global warming...